Connect with us

Financial News

Ford Recalls 215,834 Cars

Published

on

Over the course of the past two months, Ford has issued a total of three separate recalls covering 215,834 vehicles due to safety concerns. (The Ford Motor Company (F) symbol) Ford Motor Company Report undoubtedly wishes it could take refuge within the engine compartments of its vehicles. However, this might not be the best course of action given the circumstances.

According to a statement that the company in Dearborn, Michigan sent to UPI, on July 8 the company issued a safety recall for a total of 100,689 of its 2020-2022 Corsair, Escape, and Maverick vehicles with 2.5 liter HEV/PHEV engines because of an under-hood fire hazard. The vehicles were manufactured between 2020 and 2022.

“Ford is issuing a safety recall for certain vehicles with 2.5-liter HEV/PHEV engine because in the event of an engine failure, significant quantities of engine oil and/or fuel vapor may be released into the under hood environment and may migrate to and/or accumulate near ignition sources resulting in potential under hood fire, localized melting of components, or smoke,” Ford said.

The Automobile Manufacturer Will Notify Owners of Affected Vehicles

Ford has stated that it informed dealers on July 8 and will notify vehicle owners on August 8 that dealers will repair the problems by altering the under engine shield and active grille shutter on impacted vehicles. This information will be sent to vehicle owners. It was stated that isolated engine manufacturing defects led to engine failures in 2.5-liter HEV and PHEV vehicles, which resulted in a breach in the engine block or oil pan.

Ford’s announcement on the same day that it had identified a remedy for customers affected by a separate under-hood fire recall of certain 2021 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator SUVs coincided with the company’s safety recall on July 8. The announcement came at the same time as the safety recall. The manufacturer is warning consumers that until a dealer services their vehicle for the recall, they should store their vehicles outside and away from structures until the recall is resolved. It was said that there was a possibility of a fire starting under the hood of the vehicle, even if the vehicle was parked and the engine was turned off.

A total of 66,221 of the automaker’s 2021 Expedition and Lincoln Navigator SUVs were included in the recall that was announced on May 19. Since May, it has been reported that there have been a total of 21 under-hood fires in vehicles, with 18 of those fires occurring in vehicles owned by auto rental firms. According to Ford, repairs involving battery connection boxes that may have melted can be done right now. When the necessary parts become available in early September, we will likely begin the process of repairing cooling fan systems that use 700 watts.

Advertisement

According to the statement, Ford has determined that a shift in production location made by one of its suppliers during the COVID-19 epidemic was the root cause of the fires that broke out in their vehicles. Printed circuit boards that were manufactured at this plant are more vulnerable to a high-current short. These printed circuit boards were supplied to Ford and installed in Expedition and Navigator SUVs that were manufactured during the window that was subject to the recall.

Cars May Be Driven by Their Owners If They Have Permission.

Ford has stated that it has not given any orders to its customers to stop driving vehicles that are subject to the recall, and the company is not aware of any incidents that have been caused by this issue. The company has stated that it is aware of one injury that has been reported.

The carmaker also issued a safety recall on June 15 for 48,924 Mustang Mach-E electric vehicles on June 15 for a software update to prevent overheating of the vehicles’ high-voltage battery main contactors. The fix was intended to prevent the problem. Because of this issue, an overheated relay switch may open while the vehicle is being driven, which may result in a loss of motive power and increase the likelihood of an accident occurring.

Under the terms of the recall, Ford has not issued any directives telling customers to stop driving their Mustang Mach-E vehicles. There are a combined total of 215,834 automobiles affected by the three recalls.

Financial News

China State-Owned Giants May Delist From US Exchanges

Published

on

By

Exchanges

Five of China’s largest state-owned corporations want to delist from US exchanges as the two countries struggle to agree on auditing Chinese businesses.
China Life Insurance Co., PetroChina Co., and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. announced their delisting intentions Friday, together with Aluminum Corp. of China and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co.

The US and China have been at conflict for 20 years over American inspectors’ access to Chinese company audit work files. Negotiators haven’t reached a deal despite a 2024 deadline to shut down noncompliant enterprises. Mainland China and Hong Kong are the only two jurisdictions that don’t allow PCAOB inspections, citing security and confidentiality concerns.

As US and Chinese officials struggle to achieve a settlement, speculation mounts that sensitive Chinese companies could leave US markets willingly.

“These state-owned firms are in vital areas and may have access to information foreign regulators don’t,” said Saxo Markets strategist Redmond Wong.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission said the delisting plans were business-related.

Bloomberg Intelligence projected in May that 300 Chinese and Hong Kong companies worth $2.4 trillion risk being removed off US exchanges as the SEC raises scrutiny. China Life, PetroChina, China Petroleum & Chemical, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., and Baidu Inc.

Uncertain if delisting will improve discussions on audit inspections, a US regulatory requirement aimed to safeguard investors from accounting frauds and other financial wrongdoing. The 2024 deadline comes from a popular 2020 bill, the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act.

Advertisement

PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said a voluntarily delisting may not stop the board from reviewing audit work papers. The PCAOB’s jurisdiction to investigate was retrospective, so the watchdog could still require work files from departing corporations, Williams noted.

If a corporation or issuer delists this year, it doesn’t matter to Williams because he wants to know if they committed fraud last year.

Alibaba joined a growing list of corporations that could be booted off American exchanges on July 29.

Alibaba stated in July it was seeking a Hong Kong main listing, joining Bilibili and Zai Lab. The switch might help corporations attract more Chinese investors and provide a model for US-listed Chinese enterprises facing delisting.

Alibaba stated in August it would aim to keep its NYSE and HKE listings.

Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, China Life, and Sinopec sank 3% in US pre-market trade. PetroChina lost 1% and Kraneshares CSI China Internet Fund ETF sank 1.8%.

China considers eight companies listed on major US exchanges to be “national-level Chinese state-owned enterprises,” according to a congressional investigation. China Southern Airlines Co., Huaneng Power International Inc., Aluminum Corp. of China, China Eastern Airlines Corp., and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical.

Delistings will have little impact on the companies because their New York shares are thinly traded, but they highlight rising US-China tensions, said Bloomberg Intelligence strategist Marvin Chen.

Advertisement

Relations between the superpowers have been tight following Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan provoked Chinese military drills near the island.

Congress may speed up the delisting deadline to 2023, adding pressure for the two parties to achieve a compromise.

The PCAOB chair declined to set a deadline for reaching a deal with Chinese officials, but said it must be soon.

China Mobile Ltd., China Telecom Corp., and China Unicom Hong Kong Ltd. were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in January 2018 after President Trump banned investment in Chinese enterprises with military ties. Huaneng Power International plans to delist owing to poor volume and administrative complexity and costs.

Read More Financial News Here

Continue Reading

Financial News

Tesla Stock Rises As Elon Musk Sells $6.9 Billion Worth of Shares

Published

on

By

Tesla Stock

“It is crucial to avoid an emergency sale of Tesla stock,” Musk wrote, “in the event that Twitter compels this deal to close, which is hopefully improbable, and certain equity partners don’t come through.”
The announcement that Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk had sold approximately $7 billion worth of stock in order to set aside cash for his contentious purchase of Twitter caused the company’s shares to rise on Wednesday (TWTR).
According to documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Musk sold 7.92 million shares between August 5 and August 9, resulting in a profit of around $6.9 billion. After sales of approximately 8.5 billion in early April, he still controls approximately 155 million shares of the clean energy carmaker, which accounts for 15% of the company.

Musk claimed that he wanted to avoid a “emergency sale” of Tesla stock in the event that “Twitter forces this deal to close *and* some equity partners don’t come through” on the $44 billion transaction. He took advantage of a 47% rally in Tesla shares between late May and August 5, when the first sale was made, in order to accomplish this goal.

He also stated that he would repurchase the stock in the event that the Twitter deal, which is scheduled to be heard by a judge from the Delaware court system in the middle of October, is finally unsuccessful.
During the late morning session of trading on Wednesday, Tesla shares were marked 2% higher to reach a price of $868.20 a share. In the meantime, Twitter shares increased by 3.4% to $44.30 per share.
Since the beginning of July, Musk has been in a public dispute with Twitter regarding the number of accounts on the social media platform that are referred to as “fake” or “bots.” Musk believes that these accounts constitute a material change to the terms of the merger that he agreed to in the spring.

Twitter, for its part, is suing Musk to force him to purchase the group for $44 billion, or $54.20 per share. In court papers published last week, Twitter argued that the idea of a “billionaire founder of multiple companies, advised by Wall Street bankers and lawyers” being “hoodwinked into signing a $44 billion merger agreement” is “as implausible and contrary to fact as it sounds.” Twitter is suing Musk to force him to purchase the group for $44 billion.

Twitter was forced to manage a slowdown in worldwide ad spending and the uncertainty tied to Musk’s disputed takeover, which resulted in the company posting an unexpected loss for the second quarter late last month.
The company stated that this was due to “headwinds in the advertising industry associated with the macroenvironment as well as uncertainty related to the pending acquisition of Twitter by an affiliate of Elon Musk.” Group revenues decreased by 1% to $1.14 billion, again falling short of the Street forecast of a $1.315 billion tally. Twitter said that this was because of “uncertainty related to the pending acquisition of Twitter by an affiliate of Elon Musk.”

Read More Financial News Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Financial News

New Tax Credit Affects Top-Selling EVs

Published

on

By

Evs

In a win for Democrats, the Inflation Reduction Act passed the Senate and will likely pass the House. If all goes as planned, President Biden might sign the bill in two weeks.

For the auto sector, the proposal expands the $7,500 federal tax credit for EVs by removing the 200,000-vehicle cap.

While it sounds excellent for automakers, new requirements mean 70% of EVs and PHEVs won’t qualify for the credit.

72 EV models are currently available in the U.S., including battery, plug-in hybrid, and fuel cell electric vehicles, says John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group that includes GM, Toyota, and Ford. 70% of EVs would be disqualified when the measure passes, and none would qualify for the entire credit when further sourcing restrictions take effect. Zero.”

These changes will make EV tax incentives more restrictive:

North America must finish assembly.

Car MSRP must be below $55,000, and trucks and SUVs below $80,000.

Advertisement

The U.S. or free-trade partners must supply battery materials by 2024.

In less than two years, the last battery sourcing component will mean no EVs qualify for the credit, says Bozzella. The plan imposes consumer income criteria that will make many high-earning Americans and joint filers ineligible for tax advantages.

The Automotive Alliance for Innovation lists all zero-emission EVs and PHEVs on sale in America, as well as EV and battery producers.

Yahoo Finance has verified how the top 5 EVs and PHEVs in America will fare under the new guidelines.

Models 3 and Y

Following enactment, both U.S.-made Model 3 cars and Model Y SUVs, the best selling EVs in America, would qualify for the tax credit, a benefit for Tesla given the credit is currently being phased out. Registration data is used as a proxy for Tesla Model 3 and Model Y sales.

Only the $46,990 Model 3 RWD qualifies. Assuming the Model Y is an SUV, both versions qualify (Long Range – $65,990; Performance – $69,990).
Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E finished second in EV/PHEV sales last quarter with 10,941 units. The $43,895 base Mach-E might qualify as a vehicle or SUV, and because it’s produced in Mexico, it would qualify for the tax credit.
Jeep 4xE

Advertisement

Last quarter, 10,861 Wrangler 4xE plug-in hybrids were sold. With a starting MSRP of $54,595, it would qualify for the tax credit because it’s built at Jeep’s Toledo, Ohio plant.
Kia EV6 and Hyundai IONIQ5

The all-electric Hyundai IONIQ 5 sold 7,448 units in the second quarter, and Kia’s EV6 EV sold 7,287. The IONIQ 5 and Kia EV 6 are constructed in South Korea, so they don’t qualify for the tax credit. This is a hit for Hyundai as the IONIQ 5 and EV6 have been hailed by reviewers and start at $39,950 and $33,900 respectively. The affordable MSRPs may still make both feasible options for many Americans despite loss of the credit.
Bolt EV/EUV

GM’s Bolt EV and Bolt EUV sold 6,945 units last quarter. With a starting price of $25,600, it’s the cheapest pure electric vehicle on the market, and final assembly will take place at GM’s Orion factory in Michigan.
Audi e-tron, Polestar 2

Popular cars including the Audi e-tron, Lucid Air, Polestar 2 sedan, and Porsche Taycan that currently qualify for the federal tax credit will not if the bill is enacted into law.

Manufacturers may no longer need incentives, so all is not lost.

Sam Fiorani, Vice President of Global Vehicle Forecasting at AutoForecast Solutions, told Yahoo Finance, “By the time vehicle makers can take full credit for the legislation, the market will be ready to accept electric vehicles and the incentives will no longer be necessary.” Without incentives, the buyer’s pricing won’t alter much. These incentives boost prices and boost manufacturing profits.

Read More Financial News Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 | All Rights Reserved RISK DISCLAIMER There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Financial Wars and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibility for your trading and investment results. All the material contained herein is believed to be correct, however, Financial Wars will not be held responsible for accidental oversights, typos, or incorrect information from sources that generate fundamental and technical information. Options trading carries significant risk. Futures and futures options trading carries significant risk. Trading securities, security options, futures and/or futures options is not for every investor, and only risk capital should be used. You are responsible for understanding the risk involved with trading options. Prior to trading any securities products, please read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options and the Risk Disclosure for Futures and Options. The indicators, strategies, columns, and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of Financial Wars may have a position or affect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies. All of our partners or affiliated companies are in no way associated with the proprietary information provided by the Financial Wars Trading Method or software. All returns are based off buy side analysis and do not include commission costs. All projections are based on current returns. The projections do not account for any possible draw down effects on performance and performance projections. Actual returns and projected returns may fluctuate over the course of the service. "VIP" or "Lifetime" designation refers to the lifetime of the product only and not to be assumed to be the lifetime of any individual. Any person who chooses to use this information as a basis for their trading assumes all the liability and risk for themselves and hereby and absolutely agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Financial Wars, its principals, agents and employees. As a Student and Chat Subscriber, we ask that you please cross check the information posted here. We ask that you challenge any information you feel is incorrect. We do not guarantee any of the information that is posted in the chat. All company names are trademarks or registered trademarks if their respective holders. Use of a mark does not imply any affiliation or endorsement by them.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com