Connect with us

Economic News

Major Takeaways From The G7 Summit



The 48th G7 summit was held in Schloss Elmau, Krün, Bavarian Alps, Germany, on June 26-28, 2022. Seven of the world’s richest countries meet annually to discuss security, economic, and environmental issues. Boris Johnson, Olaf Scholz, Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, Mario Draghi, Fumio Kishida, and Joe Biden attended. After annexing Crimea, Russia has been barred from the G8 since 1998. First summit for Olaf Scholz and Fumio Kishida.


The summit discussed key themes as usual. G7 summit supported Ukraine, threatened anti-Russian penalties, and discussed climate. The three-day G7 conference resulted in more definitive support for Ukraine, greater political and economic pressure on Russia, better climate protection, and a call to China to respect human rights.

Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Canada, and the USA decided to intensify sanctions against Russia by barring Russian gold imports. Russian energy raw material price capping is also at risk.

The G7 expects China not to help Russia dodge sanctions, said German Chancellor Scholz. The group also urged Beijing to act judiciously in its disagreement with Taiwan, respect human rights not just in Tibet, Hong Kong, or Xinjiang province, and not utilize forced labor against its opponents.

PGII is a counterweight to China’s New Silk Road megaproject. Western countries regard the Belt and Road Initiative as Beijing’s attempt to gain influence in Asia and other continents. Over the next five years, the G7 will invest $600 billion in global infrastructure. Biden said.

Another hot topic was food safety. The G7 blames Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and blockade of Ukrainian grain exports for the present surge in food and fertilizer prices and the global food crisis.

The G7 will impose more restrictions on Russia, reducing its income, particularly from gold sales. They may also cap Russian oil prices. G7 officials say Russia’s aggressive assault against Ukraine is also to blame for rising food and fertilizer costs and the world’s food crisis. Monday, June 27th, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy videoconferenced with the statement.


Argentina, India, Indonesia, Senegal, and South Africa were also invited. Leaders decided to boost global collaboration. They will pursue new partnerships for a just energy change with Vietnam, Indonesia, India, and Senegal.

G7 sanctions, energy, and food agreements

G7 communique: “We will explore further measures to prevent Russia from profiting from its war of aggression. We will further reduce reliance on civil nuclear and related goods from Russia, including working to assist countries seeking to diversify their supplies. For oil, we’ll investigate a number of alternatives, including a possible global ban on transporting Russian seaborne crude oil and petroleum products unless it’s purchased at or below an agreed-upon price with foreign partners.”


“In coordination with the IEA, we will explore additional measures to reduce price surges and prevent further impacts on our economies and societies, in the G7 and global,” the communiqué read.


“We commit to an additional $4.5 billion to protect the most vulnerable from hunger and malnutrition, amounting to a total of over $14 billion as our joint commitment to global food security this year,” the G7 said. G7 summit communique: “We invite all like-minded countries to consider joining us in our actions.”

Peaceful Protest

Antiglobalists protested at prior G7 summits. 20 000 police were ready, but protests were minimal.

Economic News

Top Economist Mohamed El-Erian Warns Of “Violent” Shocks That Might Change Global Economics





One Analyst, Mohamed El-Erian, has cautioned that investors should brace themselves for a severe recession that has the potential to irrevocably alter the global economics.

The economist stated on Tuesday that there are a number of factors that are likely to weigh on growth, including pressures on supply, tightening by central banks, and “fragility” in the market.

El-Erian wrote in an opinion piece for Foreign Affairs that “three new trends in particular hint at such a transformation and are likely to play an important role in shaping global economics over the next few years: the shift from insufficient demand to insufficient supply as a major multi-year drag on growth; the end of boundless liquidity from central banks; and the increasing fragility of financial markets.”

“These shifts help explain many of the unusual economic developments of the last few years, and they are likely to drive even more uncertainty in the future as shocks grow more frequent and more violent,” he added. “These shifts help explain many of the unusual economic developments of the last few years.” Individuals, businesses, and governments will all be impacted by these shifts, which will have economic, social, and political repercussions. This warning comes at a time when numerous organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund and the Institute of International Finance, are predicting a slowdown in economic activity in the coming year.

As a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February, global supply chains have become more constrained, which has caused prices of commodities ranging from crude oil to wheat to skyrocket.

In the meantime, central banks such as the Federal Reserve in the United States have begun to aggressively raise interest rates. This could be starting to bring inflation under control, but it will also have a negative impact on the growth of global economics.

Rate hikes have also exposed vulnerabilities in particular markets, which has resulted in the S&P 500 falling 15.5% this year and the crypto success story from the previous year turning sour after a major exchange FTX suffered a solvency crisis and eventually filed for bankruptcy. Both of these events were caused by rate hikes. El-Erian stated that analysts need to move away from the idea that the downturn will be a short, sharp recession. It was this way of thinking, he warned, that had led the Fed’s classification of inflation as only “transitory,” even as prices creeped up last year.


“From the initial misjudgment that inflation would be ‘transitory’ to the current consensus that a probable US recession will be’short and shallow,’ there has been a strong tendency to see economic challenges as both temporary and quickly reversible,” he said. “From the initial misjudgment that inflation would be ‘transitory’ to the current consensus that a probable US recession will be’short and shallow,’” he said.

But, as El-Erian pointed out, “these shifts will affect individuals, corporations, and governments — economically, socially, and politically.” “Until analysts wake up to the possibility that these patterns will outlast the subsequent business cycle, the economic hardships that they inflict are likely to greatly outweigh the benefits that they generate,”

Read More Economic News Here

Continue Reading

Economic News

Retail Crime May Ruin Holiday Shopping





As the holiday shopping season approaches, there is an upsurge in organized retail crime, about which some executives have justifiably raised the alarm. According to the National Retail Federation’s 2022 National Retail Security Survey, overall losses from shrink, the word retailers frequently use to describe theft and other sorts of inventory losses, rose by almost 4% in 2021 to reach $94.5 billion. The report published in mid-September stated that external theft, especially theft attributable to ORC [organized retail crime], was the main cause of shrink losses. According to the poll, 81.2% of retailers reported “slightly more” or “far more” ORC-related hostility and violence compared to the previous year. ORC occurrences increased by 26.5% on average in 2021.

A factor influencing Target’s gross margin, according to CFO Michael Fiddelke, is “inventory shortage, or shrink, which is a rising challenge facing all retailers,” he said during the company’s third-quarter results call in mid-November. At Target, the incremental scarcity has already decreased our gross margin by more than $400 million compared to last year, and we anticipate that it will decrease by more than $600 for the entire year, he said. “This is a problem that affects the entire sector and is frequently caused by criminal networks. We are working with a variety of partners to establish industry-wide solutions.” On the conference call, the company’s CEO, Brian Cornell, referred to theft as a “increasing financial headwind” for the entire sector. He continued, “We’ve witnessed an upsurge in theft and organized retail crime across our industry, along with other merchants. “As a result, we’re spending a lot of money on technology and training that can prevent theft and keep our customers and store employees safe.”

Rite Aid officials had mentioned shrink as a problem the pharmacy chain was having about a month and a half before. They said during the Rite Aid quarterly results call in September. Heyward Donigan, CEO of Rite Aid since 2019, claimed that the pharmacy firm had seen “shrink has presented unexpected challenges, especially in our urban shops in New York. A $5 million rise in shrinkage and other factors “had an impact on the company’s front-end gross profit, “based on Matt Schroeder, CFO. The climate we operate in, especially in New York City, is not conducive to minimizing shrink, according to what you read and see on social media and the local news, according to Chief Retail Officer Andre Persaud at the time.

Rite Aid is enhancing its “product protection” and “structured retail client program,” he said, adding that the company’s ultimate goal is to “remain in the communities.”

Rite Aid has been “looking at essentially putting everything behind showcases” in some places, Persaud said in September, in addition to examining pharmacy-only and pharmacy prescription-only models and stationing off-duty law enforcement officers at specific stores. Concerns regarding organized retail crime have already been expressed by retailers. In a letter sent to House and Senate leaders in December of last year, the heads of numerous retailers, including Best Buy, Dollar General, and Kroger, expressed their concern about the “growing impact organized retail crime is having on the communities we proudly serve” and their support for the Integrity, Notification, and Fairness in Online Retail Marketplaces for Consumers Act.

“Organized crime has significantly increased in towns across the country, impacting retail enterprises of all types,” the executives stated. “While we continually invest in people, regulations, and cutting-edge technology to fight theft, criminals are taking advantage of the Internet’s anonymity and some marketplaces’ failure to authenticate their sellers.” “This trend has affected legitimate firms who are forced to compete against dishonest vendors, made retail establishments a target for increasing theft, and has dramatically increased consumer exposure to harmful and deadly counterfeit products.”

Continue Reading

Economic News

The Risk Of Borrowing From American Lenders, According To Deutsche Bank





European businesses borrowing money from American lenders are given a stern warning by Germany’s Deutsche Bank: If conditions go rough, they will stop lending to you.

The warning, which was outlined in an interview with board member Fabrizio Campelli of Deutsche Bank, is the most recent escalation in a struggle with American banks for the patronage of European businesses on its own soil.

It occurs as the largest lender in Germany’s corporate banking division is seeing a rebound as it nears the conclusion of a protracted restructuring.

Without giving any specific instances, he said: “A lot of European corporates are already realizing the risks of not engaging with companies who are long-term dedicated to the geographies… in which they operate.”

Campelli, who is in charge of both the investment bank and Deutsche’s business division, claimed that American lenders “tend to flex lending up and down depending on conditions.”

Again without providing any specific examples, he continued, “There was evidence of non-German banks in our nation pulling financing off the table as German banks were going longer-credit during the epidemic, in 2020.

According to statistics from Dealogic from a recent report, the five biggest U.S. banks last year—JPMorgan, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and Citigroup—took home a combined 35% share of the revenue from loans made to German companies, up from 18% a decade earlier.


Christian Sewing, the CEO of Deutsche Bank, has issued a warning over the “danger” of Europe’s reliance on foreign banks, equating the threat to the area’s reliance on outsiders for energy.

Deutsche Bank has always emphasized the necessity for Europe to have powerful banks in order to compete with American and Chinese rivals, but the most recent rhetoric indicates a more confrontational tone.

In order to support European lenders, Campelli urged politicians and regulators to take a “concerted approach.” In 2019, Deutsche started a transformation with the goal of moving away from its erratic investment bank and toward its more conservative operations that cater to businesses and consumers.

After years of failure to fulfill that promise, the tide is now changing, helped along by rising interest rates. Although conflict, skyrocketing prices, and energy expenses are casting a shadow over the future, higher borrowing costs are fattening earnings from conventional banking.

Campelli, who had previously been in charge of the renovation, stated, “We’re now getting there.” “Did we depend on the investment bank more in 2020–2021 than we had anticipated? Yes. A significantly more balanced mix of earnings is beginning to emerge.”

American banks dispute the criticism. One of the biggest banks in Germany today, JPMorgan, claims to be devoted.

According to Stefan Behr, head of JPMorgan’s operations in Europe, “many of the German banks cooperate with us on projects as well as us being a banking partner to them,” he hasn’t noticed any resistance to the bank’s expansion in Germany.

“For every contract, competition exists. Just like we’re not happy if we lose a mandate, I’m sure they’re not happy when they don’t win it “said Behr.


According to Stefan Hafke, head of Citigroup’s German operations, the company’s clientele in Germany consists of “extremely long-term, durable connections.”

He argued against being a purely American bank and stated that he desired strong European banks in Germany. We are conducting our business on an equal basis with everyone else, he declared.

Goldman declined to comment despite a recent increase in employment there. A request for comment from Morgan Stanley did not receive a prompt response.

There is no pushback, according to a Bank of America representative, who also stressed that Germany is crucial to the company’s strategy.

Read More Economic News Here

Continue Reading


© Copyright 2022 | All Rights Reserved RISK DISCLAIMER There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Financial Wars and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibility for your trading and investment results. All the material contained herein is believed to be correct, however, Financial Wars will not be held responsible for accidental oversights, typos, or incorrect information from sources that generate fundamental and technical information. Options trading carries significant risk. Futures and futures options trading carries significant risk. Trading securities, security options, futures and/or futures options is not for every investor, and only risk capital should be used. You are responsible for understanding the risk involved with trading options. Prior to trading any securities products, please read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options and the Risk Disclosure for Futures and Options. The indicators, strategies, columns, and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of Financial Wars may have a position or affect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies. All of our partners or affiliated companies are in no way associated with the proprietary information provided by the Financial Wars Trading Method or software. All returns are based off buy side analysis and do not include commission costs. All projections are based on current returns. The projections do not account for any possible draw down effects on performance and performance projections. Actual returns and projected returns may fluctuate over the course of the service. "VIP" or "Lifetime" designation refers to the lifetime of the product only and not to be assumed to be the lifetime of any individual. Any person who chooses to use this information as a basis for their trading assumes all the liability and risk for themselves and hereby and absolutely agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Financial Wars, its principals, agents and employees. As a Student and Chat Subscriber, we ask that you please cross check the information posted here. We ask that you challenge any information you feel is incorrect. We do not guarantee any of the information that is posted in the chat. All company names are trademarks or registered trademarks if their respective holders. Use of a mark does not imply any affiliation or endorsement by them.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :