JetBlue Airways has offered $3.6 billion for Spirit Airlines, but the discount carrier is still holding out hope that they’ll get more than their current offer from another company merger with Frontier Airline instead of doing business as usual and accepting this lowball deal.
On Monday, JetBlue made a $30-per-share tender offer to Spirit shareholders and urged them to vote against the Frontier merger at a June 10 Spirit meeting. If Spirit wants to negotiate, the company said its original offer of $33 per share is still on the table.
JetBlue turned down a $2.9 billion stock-and-cash deal with Frontier earlier this month in favor of their own smaller offer which was eventually accepted by Spirit’s board members last week after much negotiation between both sides over regulatory concerns regarding an acquisition by Jet airways Incorporated (JTA).
JetBlue has accused Spirit of using a smokescreen to avoid addressing regulatory risks that might apply if their merger was approved. CEO Robin Hayes said in an internal memo, “We’re offering shares at slightly lower prices than what we originally offered because these boards don’t allow us enough time or access.”
Spirit’s CEO Ted Christie responded to the comments made by Bloomberg’s anonymous source later Monday and said they are putting in “a tremendous amount of effort” into reviewing JetBlue Airlines’ offer. In an interview with CNBC’s ‘Power Lunch,’ he continued that this misinformation could cause problems for Spirit if it isn’t taken care quickly enough: “We have a lot at stake here.”
JetBlue has intentions to buy up Frontier and Spirit in order gain access into larger planes,
trained pilots that can fly them around safely as well the ability to compete more easily with Big Four U.S airlines who control most of the American marketplace.
Mixing together all of the above would result in Spirit becoming the country’s fifth-largest airline.
Spirit and Frontier Airlines are the two most affordable airlines in America, with a similar model of tighter seating for an ultra-low fare. Their business class service can be compared to that offered by JetBlue which features free WiFi while your seatback TV will keep you entertained during flight time.
Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said that despite the differences between SAVE and Frontier, their operating models are similar enough to drive efficiencies. “JBLU is a more direct competitor in premium markets where network carriers have shifted focus,” she added “The airline industry has always been competitive but we believe there are structural changes taking place now which will lead us towards greater levels of competition going forward.”
When Bill Franke, the former chairman and CEO of Spirit Airlines left his position in 2013 to become Indigo Partners’ managing partner-in-charge; they bought Frontier Airline. However he hasn’t been able or willing to respond to requests for comment.
JetBlue’s Hayes suggested that previously-laid plans for Spirit and Frontier to combine were hurting the airline’s stock price.
The news that Spirit Airlines rejected $3.6 billion in cash from JetBlue last month put them at a crossroads, and now they have an opportunity to grow stronger as demand for new narrow-body planes is high right now with pilots also being in short supply.
Spirit Airlines is turning down an offer from JetBlue because they don’t think the deal will be approved by regulators, but CEO Dave Couteur has ” wondered whether blocking our merger with Frontier might actually serve their goal.” American refused to comment.
Spirit’s CEO was firm in his resolve and turned down an offer from JetBlue, which would have allowed them to continue operating without divestiture or approval on Antitrust grounds. Instead they demanded $200 million as a reverse breakup fee if the deal wasn’t approved within three months time frame.
The Department of Transportation is declining to comment on the deal, but will help support any analysis from Justice Department officials.
During his interview with Squawk Box, he said that one way to make sure the American people are served well by a healthy airline sector is through competition.
On Monday, shares of spirit jumped more than 13% while those for JetBlue Airways fell 6%. The Frontier Airline also enjoyed a strong close to the day with an increase near 6%, although stocks declined overall as well.
New to financialwars? Read our latest article here
Meta Is Fined $275 Million By The Irish Data Privacy Authorities
In a data breach that occurred in 2019, Meta was issued a fine of approximately $275 million by Ireland’s data privacy commission for its failure to prevent hackers from stealing the personal information of more than 500 million Facebook users.
The announcement made on Monday marked the fourth time in about a year that Facebook (FBparent )’s corporation had been punished by the Irish Data Protection Commission. The Irish Data Protection Commission is the major privacy regulator monitoring Meta’s operations in Europe. According to the commission’s statement, the decision to issue the fine was reached on Friday of last week.
Meta has been hit with fines totaling 912 million euros by the Data Protection Commission of Ireland (DPC) since the fall of 2021. The DPC is pursuing the social media giant and its other subsidiaries, Instagram and WhatsApp, for alleged violations of the General Data Protection Regulation, which is Europe’s signature data privacy law (GDPR).
In the early fall of this year, Meta was handed the second-largest GDPR fine in history, which was for the way in which Instagram handled the data of children. The fine was 405 million euros. Additional enforcement procedures, which took place in March 2022 and September 2021, respectively, resulted in the imposition of fines totaling 17 million and 225 million euros.
A representative for Meta issued a statement on Monday stating that the company was “seriously” analyzing the decision made by the DPC and that it had cooperated fully with the investigation being conducted by the agency. The investigation was kicked out in April of last year after it was reported by Business Insider that the personal information of more than half a billion Facebook users had been published on a hacker website. At the time, Facebook stated that hostile actors had used its contact importer tool in order to match known phone numbers to the accounts of Facebook users before extracting more information from their profiles. According to a statement released by Meta on Monday, “Protecting the privacy and security of people’s data is crucial to how our business works.” [Citation needed] “During the time in question, we implemented a number of changes to our systems, one of which was the removal of the capability to scrape our features in this manner by using phone numbers. The scraping of data without authorization is against both our policy and our terms of service, and we will continue to collaborate with our competitors to find a solution to this industry problem.
This judgment was made by the Irish Data Protection Commissioner in the midst of widespread criticism from privacy activists who claim that regulators have proceeded slowly and tentatively to enforce GDPR, which became law in 2018.
Privacy regulators in Luxembourg issued a punishment of 746 million euros to e-commerce giant Amazon (AMZN) in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) last year. They did so on the grounds that the manner in which Amazon processes personal data is in violation of the law. Amazon (AMZN) is attempting to get the penalty overturned.
Musk Alleges Apple “Threatening To Withhold” Twitter From Its App Store
Elon Musk said that Apple has “threatened” to remove Twitter from its iOS app store, which might devastate the $44 billion firm he acquired.
Musk tweeted Monday that Apple (AAPL) and its CEO had threatened to remove Twitter from its App Store without explaining why.
Musk tweeted that Apple had basically discontinued Twitter advertising. “Do they detest free speech in America?” he asked, referring to his repeated calls for platform free speech. “What’s up, Tim Cook?” Musk tweeted again. He also blasted Apple’s scale, “restriction,” and 30% transaction fee for large app creators in its app store.
Musk’s tweetstorm emphasizes his tense relationship with Apple, which along with Google controls mobile app distribution. Before taking over Twitter, the Tesla CEO stated he explored selling the firm to Apple, but Cook refused to meet with him. Twitter, which has lost advertisers since Musk’s takeover and struggled to grow its subscription business, would suffer if it were removed from Apple’s or Google’s app stores.
Musk’s tweets were unanswered by Apple. The business has already indicated it’s willing to delete apps from its app store over worries about their ability to filter dangerous content or if they attempt to evade the cut Apple takes from in-app sales and subscriptions. After the US Capitol attack, Apple withdrew Parler, a conservative app, from its app store over concerns about its capacity to recognize and filter hate speech and incitement. After improving its content moderation, Apple reinstated Parler three months later.
Apple’s app store review criteria require apps to prevent “material that is unpleasant, insensitive, distressing, intended to disgust, in extraordinarily poor taste, or just plain creepy” such hate speech, pornography, and terrorism. The guidelines declare that the App Store is not the place for apps that shock and offend.
After extensive layoffs and large employee departures, civil society groups, researchers, and industry watchers have voiced worries about Twitter’s ability to monitor dangerous content and keep the network safe. Musk also wants to promote “free expression” on Twitter by restoring banned or suspended accounts. Musk has tweeted a conspiracy theory and other controversial messages since taking over Twitter.
Since becoming CEO, Musk, a prolific and aggressive tweeter, has continued. He claims engagement has compensated for revenue losses. The objective appears to be persistently targeting enemies of his or “free speech.” Cook was questioned in an interview earlier this month if Twitter might alter to make Apple remove it from the app store. “They say they’ll moderate and so… “I trust them,” Cook said. Because no one wants hate speech on their platform. I expect them to continue.”
Last week, Twitter’s former head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, who departed the business earlier this month, wrote in the New York Times that app store operators had started calling Twitter after Musk’s takeover. Roth called violating Google and Apple’s app store guidelines “catastrophic.”
Last Sunday, Apple app store boss Phil Schiller canceled his Twitter account.
Apple ran Black Friday adverts on Twitter on Thursday, though their relationship is unclear.
As the economy has weakened, many corporations have cut digital ad expenditure, and Twitter has likely always been a modest part of Apple’s budget. If Musk succeeds in converting Twitter’s core business to subscription revenue and needs to give Apple a 30% cut, Apple’s impact on Twitter may be considerably greater.
Musk tweeted, “Apple charges a concealed 30% tax on anything you buy through their App Store?” In another tweet, he showed a motorway exit with two lanes: “pay 30%” and “go to war.” Elon’s ancient automobile slid toward him.
read More Financial News Here
Returning Disney CEO Bob Iger Outlines His Objectives
After shocking the media industry with his return as CEO of Disney the previous week, Bob Iger visited the company’s headquarters on Monday to speak with employees for the very first time since making the announcement.
Iger addressed a variety of concerns that have been raised about the corporation, including the current hiring moratorium at Disney and the areas of concentration for the Disney+ streaming service that he has in mind. In addition to this, he emphasized that the most important thing for him to focus on as he regains control is creativity.
During a town hall meeting held at the company’s headquarters in Burbank, California, Iger informed staff that Disney’s hiring freeze would continue to be in effect – at least for the time being. His predecessor, Bob Chapek, made the announcement of the hiring freeze at the beginning of this month. Iger took over as CEO of Disney after Chapek, whose time in that role was brief but fraught with conflict. Iger has stated that maintaining the freeze is the “sensible thing to do” in light of the issues that are now facing the corporation. When addressing Disney’s overall “cost structure,” he also said that the length of time the employment freeze will be in effect will be a consideration for him.
The announcement of Iger’s return comes at a time when Disney is facing a great deal of hardship and criticism across its entire media empire. Disney is currently facing challenges in both the film and television industries. This includes a share price that has remained flat during the entire year as well as a streaming business that is expanding but is still losing money. Iger stated that when he departed the firm a year ago, Disney’s performance in streaming was being judged by a variety of criteria; nonetheless, growth was the primary element being considered. Since then, the emphasis has switched to “the bottom line” and “how much we are losing and when we will be profitable,” according to Iger’s statement.
He stated that the corporation should begin “chasing profitability” rather than “chasing subs with aggressive marketing and aggressive spend on content.” He stated that in order for Disney to accomplish this goal, the company must do a “very, very serious look” at the cost structure of all of its companies. However, Iger emphasized that “creativity” should be the primary focus of the corporation, as the returning CEO already stated that this endeavor will be his top priority.
Iger was asked about Disney’s creative muscle, and he responded by saying, “A number of you who worked with me know I’m obsessed with that.” “However, there is a logic behind my fixation on that. It is the engine that keeps the business going.
Iger stated that the quantity of content that Disney develops is not as important as the “greatness of the things that we do make.”
Iger wasted no time in making his stamp on the corporation and did so immediately. Soon after it was announced that he would be taking over as CEO, he reorganized Disney’s content distribution structure and announced that Kareem Daniel, chairman of the company’s Media and Entertainment Distribution unit, would be leaving Disney. Kareem Daniel had been the person responsible for overseeing the distribution of Disney’s content.
Iger tweeted a picture of Disney’s offices early on Monday morning, which was his first day back on the Walt Disney Studio lot. He captioned the image with the phrase “full with gratitude and delight to be back.”
Economic News4 weeks ago
Inflation Fell Last Month, But Higher Rates And Job Cutbacks Are Coming
Economic News4 weeks ago
Reasons To Begin Collecting Social Security At Age 62
Economic News3 weeks ago
Even Though Inflation Was Lower In November, Consumer Sentiment Dropped Sharply
Economic News3 weeks ago
Midterms Increase The Likelihood Of A Contentious Debt Ceiling Fight
Financial News4 weeks ago
Adidas Is Rebranding Yeezys, Kanye West’s Greatest Fear