Connect with us

Financial News

Intel Shareholder Votes Against Executive Compensation Plan

Published

on

Intel shareholders overwhelmingly rejected the company’s executive compensation last week, according to an regulatory filing published on Monday. The decision is a major victory for employee advocates who have been fighting increases in salary and bonuses at tech giants like Google parent Alphabet Inc (GOOGL).

Intel’s shareholders have voted to approve a package of compensation for Chief Executive Officer Pat Gelsinger, sending the signal that some investors see him as turnaround artist and others don’t. Overall 34% Of shares were cast in support while 67 percent opposed it with 1.77 billion opposing votes overall.

Shareholders are showing their dissatisfaction with executive compensation packages by voting against them. This latest vote is just another example of how shareholders have become more vocal about what they want in terms of pay and benefits for top executives.

AT&T shareholders opposed an executive compensation measure in April. This is not the first time that they have voted against such packages, and it’s likely to happen again soon enough – 16 companies had rejected pay plans by As You Sow’ activist investor group over just three years.

Intel CEO Gelsinger took over in February 2021, and she received a compensation package worth $178.59 million later that year.

 

The hefty paycheck included over $1 million in salary, a $1.75 million bonus, over $140 million in stock awards, and nearly $30 million in option awards.

Intel has been trying to turn itself around under the leadership of CEO Brian Gelsinger. He took over in 2012, and his first order was for cutbacks: $6 billion from reduced spending on assembly lines as well as factory construction; giving up market share while building new chip factories that will produce both contract-made CPUs ( processors )and their own designs is what he means when talking about “spending heavily.”

Advertisement

Intel’s CEO, Brian Gelsinger may not receive some of the equity he was awarded because it depends on how Intel’s stock performs over five years. As reported by The Wall Street Journal in January 2019 at this time (and as far down date), there have been no payouts made yet due to lower than expected performances from both investors and share prices alike.

Last year’s compensation measure failed to gain much momentum, only 38% of employees supported it. Intel’s Proxy statement highlights the feedback from last year’s vote and how they are taking it seriously this time around. Intel’s senior leadership for 2021 includes several high-profile departures, including Sandra Rivera who is leaving her post as general manager of data center business. 3 executives left the company this year and one plans to retire by month’s end.

Intel is committed to engaging with their stockholders and addressing any concerns they may have. They have already taken specific steps in response, including making changes that will make the company’s overall compensation approach easier for investors as well clarifying goals of annual performance bonuses while increasing transparency levels on pay structures at each level within itself .

 

New to FinancialWars? Read our latest article here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Financial News

Intel’s CEO Threatens to Expand in Europe if Congress Doesn’t Act

Published

on

By

Intel

Pat Gelsinger, CEO of Intel, warned Tuesday that if Congress fails to pass $52 billion in government subsidies promised under the CHIPS Act, he may expand chip manufacturing in Europe instead of the United States.

At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Gelsinger remarked, “The rest of the world is moving rapidly despite the inability of Congress to get this finished.”

It was only in 2021 that Congress finally gave CHIPS the funding it needed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act. Attempts by the House and Senate to overcome differences on a broader package of policies to help the United States’ tech industry compete with China have left the money for subsidies stalled.

A shortage of government funding forced Intel to postpone the groundbreaking ceremony for a new $20 billion facility in Ohio, the company announced last week. He stated Tuesday, “I hate the idea of announcing a delay,” Gelsinger said.  Although Intel “would end up investing a lot more in Europe as a result,” he cautioned. A new $18 billion plant in Germany will be built as part of a $35 billion expansion of the chipmaker’s European operations.

According to Gelsinger, the CHIPS Act’s subsidies, which are limited to $3 billion per site, would help the United States “approximately competitive with other regions of the world.” There were no “handouts” in the industry, he claimed.

There are also calls from other semiconductor companies to support American chip manufacturers.

The construction of a $12 billion facility in Arizona by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation will necessitate the U.S. government to subsidize the gap in operating expenses between Taiwan and the United States.

Advertisement

Taiwanese chipmaker GlobalWafer launched a new $5 billion facility in Texas on Monday. Despite this, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told CNBC that the contract “will go away” if Congress does not approve subsidies for the project.

Government leaders in Taiwan are urging Congress to approve financing for the island nation. For the most part, this is because TSMC has already commenced construction in Arizona. Ming-Hsin Kung, a minister on Taiwan’s National Development Council, told the Washington Post on Tuesday that the Chips Act is expected to pass the Congress.

East Asian chipmakers “all believe they need to put more manufacturing in the U.S.” Gelsinger stated. There is no rivalry between us and TMSC or Samsung.” ‘We are not competing with TMSC or Samsung. We are competing with Taiwan and Japan and Korea,” he declared.

According to the European Chips Act, the European Union allocated $46 billion in support for chip manufacturing in February. Intel’s new factory in Germany will receive $7.3 billion of that money.

A $4.5 billion fund set up by the Japanese government to boost the country’s semiconductor industry would finance 40% of the cost of a new TSMC factory in Kumamoto.

As a matter of national security, according to Gelsinger, the United States must invest in chip manufacturing, transferring production away from East Asia. As he spoke, he said, “This is the future of geopolitics.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Financial News

Robinhood Shares Rise 16% After Report FTX is Considering a Buyout

Published

on

By

Robinhood

The trading of the no-commission trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) was briefly halted after it was reported, citing people with knowledge of the matter, that cryptocurrency exchange FTX was looking into a possible deal to acquire the company. This report caused the shares of Robinhood to rise by approximately 16 percent, and trading was halted briefly.

The article states that FTX has not yet made a formal offer, and it is possible that the company will decide against moving forward with any plans. An SEC document made public in May disclosed that Sam Bankman-Fried, founder and CEO of FTX, had acquired a 7.6 percent ownership in Robinhood through Emergent Fidelity Technologies Ltd., a company based in Antigua.

“We are excited about Robinhood’s business prospects and potential ways we could partner with them, and I have always been impressed by the business that [Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev] and his team have built,” wrote Bankman-Fried in a statement. “That being said, there are no active M&A conversations with Robinhood.”

Coinbase (COIN) shares were downgraded by Goldman Sachs in a report published on Monday morning. The reduction was a result of the steep decrease in cryptocurrency prices and accompanying trading activity. Goldman Sachs raised shares of Robinhood from sell to neutral.

The price of a share of Robinhood has decreased by 47 percent so far this year. They have dropped by almost 75% since its initial public offering level in July of last year. The percentage of Robinhood’s revenue that comes from commissions earned from the trading of cryptocurrencies continues to rise.

About Robinhood (HOOD)

Robinhood is a cryptocurrency broker that not only makes trades easier but also enables users to buy stocks and alternative cryptocurrencies. You may purchase and sell a variety of cryptocurrencies within the Robinhood app, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, and even Dogecoin. These cryptocurrencies are all offered by Robinhood. The absence of trading costs, which may be rather variable among traditional exchanges, is one of the primary benefits of trading cryptocurrencies on Robinhood, just as it is with the company’s other investing opportunities.

Its accessibility as an investment platform is a major lure for many users, regardless of whether they are investing in cryptocurrencies or the stock market; nevertheless, this accessibility is also what can make Robinhood risky for users. It has been criticized on the grounds that it makes trading too much like a game and that it promotes volatility through aggressive trading rather than the growth of long-term investments. If you approach an already speculative asset like cryptocurrency with such a mindset, it might make your investment an even bigger bet. This is similar to how stock transactions work. Always asses the risk involved when making investment choices and seek professional guidance to insure you make the right decision for your investment strategy.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Financial News

G7 Leaders Discuss Fossil Fuel Investments During Energy Crisis

Published

on

By

G7

Some of the leaders of the rich democracies that make up the Group of Seven (G7) are pushing for an acknowledgment of the need for new financing for investments in fossil energy at a time when European states are scrambling to diversify their supply bases.

At this year’s annual G7 summit, delegates are debating whether or not such an acknowledgment can be made to comply with an agreement that some countries made at the COP26 United Nations conference to halt financing for international fossil fuel projects by the end of 2022. This agreement was made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.

“(It is) possible that there will be wording in the declaration that investment for fossil energy should be possible for a certain time,” an EU diplomat said on the first day of the annual G7 summit, which this year is taking place in Germany.

Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, whose country is also reliant on Russian supplies, said publicly on Sunday that there is short-term need for investment in gas infrastructure “in developing countries and elsewhere.”

During a news conference regarding a G7 investment drive in developing nations, Draghi stated that converting such infrastructure to use hydrogen in the future should be viable.

As the crisis in Ukraine continues to worsen, European countries are experiencing a shortage of energy that is imported from Russia. Concerns are growing regarding the impact this will have on the industries of European countries that are particularly reliant on Moscow.

Prior to the war, Russia supplied as much as forty percent of the European Union’s gas requirements, while Germany received fifty-five percent of its gas from Russia.  The current chair of the G7, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, put the topic of new infrastructure on the agenda for the leaders, and discussions are currently taking place to determine whether or not to include it in the meeting’s final statement.

Advertisement

A spokeswoman for the German government declined to comment on the most recent events.

“It’s about the question: how do we achieve the climate transition despite using gas a bridging form of energy and how can we ensure this isn’t used as an excuse to soften the climate goals?” said a German government representative on Saturday.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 | All Rights Reserved RISK DISCLAIMER There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Financial Wars and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibility for your trading and investment results. All the material contained herein is believed to be correct, however, Financial Wars will not be held responsible for accidental oversights, typos, or incorrect information from sources that generate fundamental and technical information. Options trading carries significant risk. Futures and futures options trading carries significant risk. Trading securities, security options, futures and/or futures options is not for every investor, and only risk capital should be used. You are responsible for understanding the risk involved with trading options. Prior to trading any securities products, please read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options and the Risk Disclosure for Futures and Options. The indicators, strategies, columns, and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of Financial Wars may have a position or affect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies. All of our partners or affiliated companies are in no way associated with the proprietary information provided by the Financial Wars Trading Method or software. All returns are based off buy side analysis and do not include commission costs. All projections are based on current returns. The projections do not account for any possible draw down effects on performance and performance projections. Actual returns and projected returns may fluctuate over the course of the service. "VIP" or "Lifetime" designation refers to the lifetime of the product only and not to be assumed to be the lifetime of any individual. Any person who chooses to use this information as a basis for their trading assumes all the liability and risk for themselves and hereby and absolutely agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Financial Wars, its principals, agents and employees. As a Student and Chat Subscriber, we ask that you please cross check the information posted here. We ask that you challenge any information you feel is incorrect. We do not guarantee any of the information that is posted in the chat. All company names are trademarks or registered trademarks if their respective holders. Use of a mark does not imply any affiliation or endorsement by them.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com