NFTs Are Hampered By Reality

The world of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) is reportedly just getting started, and it goes far beyond the realm of art, as stated by Sandra Ro, the CEO of the Global Blockchain Business Council.

At a recent conference, Ro gave a presentation that provided an insider’s perspective on where we are with NFTs and where we are headed. She had some significant commercial potential, but the solutions she proposed to the problems was not particularly convincing.

Everyone can find something that interests them here, from NFT artwork to digital injections.

According to Ro, “any social or physical thing can now have a unique identifier and proof of ownership that is verifiable on the blockchain” This statement was made in reference to the technology known as the blockchain.

Even though she acknowledges that the market is “extremely messy, as all new things are,” she is of the opinion that the underlying value that is being delivered is the one-of-a-kind quality of that personally verifiable token, in addition to the potential to “inject economics” into this situation.

She gave an example of purchasing and selling without any complications, as well as fractionalized ownership. In the latter scenario, a person who is in possession of a token that represents annual membership in a sports club has the ability to sell the remaining portion of their membership to another subscriber who is interested in joining the club.

It’s hardly the worst idea in the world. In many different countries, breaking an annual contract might be a real hassle. For contracts formed before January 2022 in Germany, for example, a three-month notice or proof of departure is required; therefore, if this simplifies such processes, I am all for it.

Advertisement

NFTs, on the other hand, have the potential to transcend well beyond transactional memberships in order to act as a catalyst for value addition.

Fans of many sports can have a better view of the action thanks to the use of NFTs.

Ro envisioned a scenario in which NFTs would make it possible for fans to communicate with one another, complete with unique perks such as inner VIP access and the opportunity for advertisers to develop “more stickiness” within their communities.

Ro asserts that one can make a significant amount of money engaging in sports and NFTs. It seems to make sense to me.

Although Ro acknowledges that “there are numerous intermediates, and they are still figuring it out,” I feel that it will be substantially more challenging to adopt NFTs in the context of stadium sports.

Fans in smart sports stadiums presently have access to sports commentary and can communicate with athletes via wearable technology. These stadiums also feature sophisticated fan apps that cover several industries, such as the food and beverage industry and the transit ticket industry.

It sounds like a lot of work to get these different verticals to cooperate with one another, even though they’ve already done it successfully in an existing product.

So the question is, how do we get from crypto enthusiasts and early adopters to mainstream apps that unite massive, diverse communities?

Advertisement

Would people use non-traditional trading methods?

Ro is optimistic about the prospects of mission-driven DAOs and uses Ukraine as an example.
The National Financial Token Museum (MetaHistory NFT Museum) is a blockchain-based narrative of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that displays NFTs as examples of digital art. It was established by the Ukrainian Ministry of Digital Transformation.

Additionally, a lot of people are turning to NFTs as a means of generating income for Ukraine. Even if most people have honest motivations, I believe that the vast majority of them lack the digital auditing skills necessary to differentiate between actual accounts and fraudulent ones.

Aside from the possibility of being defrauded, there are other problems with the security of cryptocurrencies to take into consideration, as well as the obviously enormous carbon impact they have.

Regrettably, there are a lot of reasons to be concerned about this.

According to Ro, on the other hand, the Bitcoin network has never been successfully hacked. However, she does acknowledge that a large amount of energy is expended in order to provide that level of security. She was alluding to either secure cryptocurrency or an impact on the environment that had a low carbon footprint when she said, “What are you ready to live with?”

She also acknowledges that it is impossible to exclude all harmful actors. In addition, it is difficult to install safety barriers without stifling innovation. She acknowledges that accredited investors are “a very specific socio class who don’t need to create money,” but more legislation could restrict ownership of NFTs to only those investors who meet the requirements.

In my perspective, NFTs have the potential to be useful in a variety of applications. However, I am not confident that we will witness widespread adoption or the mainstreaming of their means of producing wealth.

Advertisement

My impression is that many of the same people are getting rich, with a few interesting anomalies tossed in for good measure. One such illustration is provided by JDL Street Art. The previous year, she set a record by selling artwork for a total of €2.9 million in bitcoin, and she gave one-third of that amount to a charitable organization.

Nevertheless, there is always a starting point for any activity. The essential goals of NFTs, which include integrating the physical and virtual economies, may just become a reality, despite the fact that I have my doubts that money will inevitably follow.